There is no greater sport spectacle than the FIFA World Cup. Every four years, billions of people watch the “beautiful game” at its very best. But while the football creates the memories, it is often the controversies that create the headlines.
The World Cup is now over, the fever is dying for anyone not from Spain, but the discussions live on. One of the dominant talking points from this tournament is Folarin Balogun’s controversial red card. Depending on who you ask, it was either a justified dismissal or another example of VAR overreaching. Social media has been flooded with freeze frames, slow-motion replays and amateur referees dissecting every angle. Before the final whistle had even blown, the narrative had already taken on a life of its own.
It is a reminder that the World Cup is not just a football tournament. It is one of the world’s biggest PR stages.
Penalties and perception
The tournament has always been defined by moments that transcend the sport itself. Ask fans about the 1986 World Cup and many will mention Maradona’s ‘Hand of God’ before they talk about Argentina lifting the trophy. Mention France ’98 and Beckham’s red card still divides opinions more than a quarter of a century later. Then there’s the 1970 Bogata incident in which Bobby Moore was placed under house arrest after being accused of stealing a bracelet. Or there is the 1974 Dutch pool party incident, where German tabloid Bild bribed security to allow scantily clad women into the pool area of the Dutch hotel. As they mingled out popped the paparazzi and, incidentally, the Dutch players spent the hours before the final pleading with wives and girlfriends on the phone.
Recent times haven’t been immune to controversy either. The 2006 final is remembered as much for Zinedine Zidane’s headbutt as Italy’s triumph on penalties. In 2010, Luis Suárez’s deliberate handball against Ghana created one of football’s greatest debates. Was he a desperate cheat, or simply a player willing to do whatever it took to win?
Even more recently, the build up to the 2022 World Cup in Qatar became a communications battle long before a ball was kicked. Debates around migrant workers, LGBTQ+ rights and allegations of corruption dominated headlines across the globe. FIFA, sponsors, national associations and players all found themselves navigating an unprecedented reputational challenge, proving that sometimes the biggest story isn’t on the pitch at all.
What links all these moments together is not simply controversy. It is narrative.
On the ball
The outcome of a football match is settled by the referee’s whistle. The public’s perception of what happened is settled much more slowly, shaped by television pundits, newspaper headlines, podcast debates, social media clips and countless conversations in pubs and offices around the world. Within minutes of a contentious incident, millions of people have already formed an opinion, often before all the facts are available.
For communications professionals, this will sound familiar.
Red cards and reputation
Reputation has never been determined solely by events. It is determined by how those events are interpreted, explained and remembered. Every controversial decision demonstrates just how quickly a narrative can take hold. Fans rarely debate what happened in isolation. They debate intent, fairness and context. In other words, they debate the story.
The Balogun incident is a perfect example. Regardless of whether the red card was technically correct, the discussion has centred on consistency, officiating standards and the role of VAR. The incident itself lasted seconds. The conversation has lasted long after the US were eliminated. That is the difference between an event and a narrative.
Own goals or own the headlines
This is where the World Cup offers an important lesson for brands and businesses. In an age of rolling news and social media, organisations often feel compelled to respond instantly whenever controversy arises. Yet speed alone is not a communications strategy. The brands that protect their reputations most effectively are those that understand the wider story developing around them, not just the immediate incident. They recognise that facts matter, but context matters just as much.
Football managers have understood this for years. After controversial decisions, some choose to criticise officials, others defend their players, while a few deliberately refuse to engage. Every response is calculated because they know they are speaking to more than journalists. They are speaking to supporters, sponsors, governing bodies and future opponents. Every interview becomes an opportunity to influence perception.
Businesses must tackle the challenge
The same principle applies in business. Whether facing a product recall, a social media backlash or an operational failure, the first challenge is rarely solving the problem. It is communicating about the problem in a way that maintains trust. The organisations that emerge strongest are often not those that avoided mistakes altogether, but those that managed the narrative with honesty, clarity and consistency.
The final whistle isn’t the end
Now this World Cup has finished, few people will remember every score line. They probably will not remember every goal scorer either. They will, however, remember the controversy. They will remember the decisions that sparked debate, the moments that divided opinion and the stories that dominated the headlines.
That is because football, much like PR, has never been just about what happens. It is about what people remember happening. And in both worlds, the stories that endure are rarely the simplest. They are the ones that capture the imagination, provoke debate and keep people talking long after the final whistle.
Written by: Thomas Hale
Read our next blog on: Have reactive comments lost their value?